...Should have been the title of Disney's new film other than just John Carter. I saw the film last night and recommend it. It is good exactly in the way sci-fi spectacle adventure films generally are; in other words, its entertaining, but not something you're going to go see for sparkling dialog or deep characters. If you've read the books, you'll like it. If you haven't, but you enjoy the aforementioned sort of film, you probably will, too.
The film takes Burroughs's more rambling (if such a short novel can ramble) and episodic novel and weaves it into a more linear plot, which is largely to the good. Likewise, the script-writers update of Dejah Thoris to an action and science heroine is well done. She winds up definitely being the "smart one" in her relationship with Carter. The Green Men (a term never used in the film; they only refer to themselves by their tribes, leading many reviewers to think they're race is called "Tharks") are pretty well-realized and surprisingly true to the books in terms of culture without the film be exposition-heavy (in this regard).
There are a lot of thinks I would have liked to see done different. The opening prologue/introduction with convoluted layers of narrative, is the clunkiest part of the film. It winds up having a flashback within a flashback/framing sequence. They could have gotten all those elements in, but streamlined it. Dialogue could always be a bit punchier in these sorts of things, and the mean of some terms could have been better conveyed to the uninitiated. While the costume design or the design for the Green Men aren't exactly what I would have wanted, they turn out okay, and are really just different choices. The design of the Martian cities, though, seems to be a bit of a misstep as it's rather plain and block, and exhibits no particular sense of wonder. Faithful woola hit the right notes, but the comedy doggishness of the character could have been dialed back from "11" to a "8-9."
Still, some of my quibbles can reasonably be seen as those of a fan who would never be completely happy with any adaptation. My main point is, if your on the fence because of the negative press, you shouldn't be.
I agree; 'John Carter' is the stupidest movie title ever. It tells viewers nothing at all about the movie and leaves E.R. fans scratching their heads and wondering why Noah Wiley didn't get the role.
ReplyDeleteGood review, though. I had grave reservations about the movie, especially after Conan, but I'll probably see it now. The review in my local paper gave it two stars, but the same guy also claimed that John Carter was 'heavily influenced by Star Wars and Lord of the Rings.' Is never having read a book a prerequisite to become a movie reviewer?
Hope to see it this weekend.
ReplyDeleteNice review!
@Sean - Yeah, and I think "John Carter and A Princess of Mars" has a Indiana Jones-ish pulpy feel, and air of romance, and could easily have been worked into the themes of the film.
ReplyDeleteI would say it's better than Conan, at least in the sense that I think it's more true to the tone of Burroughs works and the changes they make are (mostly) for the better whereas the changes they make from Howard's work in the Conan film are large to it's detriment.
The marketing for John Carter doesn't seem to have mentioned the connection to Avatar or Star Wars, which I find a bit surprising.
ReplyDeleteVery cool. I'll have bump this further up my "to see" list.
ReplyDeleteNot for me, not now at least... maybe in a few years I'll stumble into it and be pleasantly surprised, but at the moment it just looks irritating.
ReplyDeleteNice review. I agree mostly. It was really quite good, or at least more so than I was expecting it to be considering the reviews and terrible marketing.
ReplyDeleteMaybe when it's released on DVD they'll do the Indiana Jones thing. John Carter and A Princess of Mars.
Caught an afternoon matinee of John Carter yesterday. I quite enjoyed it.
ReplyDelete